Yes, really, the documentation about that is missing. I expected the same thing as you did.
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, [iso-8859-1] H?kon Nilsen (Exinet AS) wrote: > Hi, Maca, > > Thanks for your answer. > > This was what I expected. It's not a problem, though. I'm using MIMEdefang > and sendmail for this, and MIMEdefang has a very powerfull script. I can > just edit that, and have it ship spam messages to another mailbox or simply > nuke it. Though, I wanted to be entirely sure. > > I won't do it untill I get some more answers on my mail, though. > > And yes - SA should be able to delete the message. It would make the whole > thing a lot easier. And there should also be some documentation on this, cuz > I think many users expect SA to do just that - delete the spammy messages. > > > Thanks. > > - Haakon > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 1:56 PM > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SA and tagging/removing > > > > When I first saw the SA, I marveled, why SA cannot delete the mail. SA > can't delete the message. The possibility of the message deletion depends on > the MTA you are using. If you use procmail for local delivery, you can teach > the procmail to delete the message, if you use other program, you must teach > your program to delete. :( > > Why SA itself cannot delete??? It would be easy for programming, or not? > > > > Maca > > > > On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, [iso-8859-1] H?kon Nilsen (Exinet AS) wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm using spamassassin, and got access to an account that as A LOT of > spam > > > which I'm testing SA on. The results are very good, as to SA identifying > > > spam mail. > > > > > > > > > I'm wondering about the following: > > > - When SA tags a mail (as most configs I've seen out there does) - does > it > > > delete the mail after 'learning' about the spammers? > > > > > > - Will the user receive just as many mail, but 95% of the mails he > receive > > > are spam mail - hence just tagged, and not removed? > > > > > > - Is it recommended that I set up SA to drop any mail that classifies > as a > > > tagged mail? Instead of tagging, I could simply nuke the mails. > > > > > > > > > It's pretty usefull to tag the mail, but it's very useless if it > persists. > > > The user needs to get rid of the mail. I hope you guys can help me out > here. > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Haakon Nilsen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > _______________________________________________ > > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
