Pat Traynor wrote: > A lot of spam is slipping through. I was wondering how dangerous it > would be for me to bump up some of these scores. This is from a > typical spam I've been getting: > > X-Spam-Level: *** > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 > tests=BAYES_50 [...]
Are you training bayes with those that DO slip through? The "rules du jour" set helped set things right as well (see archives) by detecting some of the sneakier spam. This combination worked very well for me, with no need to tweak any default scores. - Bob
