spamassassin-users  

Messages by Date

• 2004/07/20 Re: Distributing SARE rules via Subversion/CVS repositories? Ralph Seichter
• 2004/07/20 RE: Going farther in spam protection Robert Bartlett
• 2004/07/20 RE: [RDJ] Is it broken? John Hardin
• 2004/07/20 Re: why lots of blank mails? Geoff Soper
• 2004/07/20 RE: [RDJ] Is it broken? John Hardin
• 2004/07/20 Re: harsh image rules Geoff Soper
• 2004/07/20 Re: harsh image rules Geoff Soper
• 2004/07/20 Going farther in spam protection Robert Bartlett
• 2004/07/20 Re: Distributing SARE rules via Subversion/CVS repositories? Theo Van Dinter
• 2004/07/20 RE: [RDJ] Is it broken? Gary Smith
• 2004/07/20 Re: RFC: sex site domain SURBL David Hooton
• 2004/07/20 FBI info Spams Obantec Support
• 2004/07/20 RE: 88_FVGT_URI.cf Chris Santerre
• 2004/07/20 RE: RFC: sex site domain SURBL Chris Santerre
• 2004/07/20 88_FVGT_URI.cf Don Newcomer
• 2004/07/20 Re: RFC: sex site domain SURBL Marc Kool
• 2004/07/20 Re: sex.surbl.org Marc Kool
• 2004/07/20 Re: Distributing SARE rules via Subversion/CVS repositories? Ralph Seichter
• 2004/07/20 Re: Distributing SARE rules via Subversion/CVS repositories? Jesse Houwing
• 2004/07/20 why lots of blank mails? sb ch
• 2004/07/20 Distributing SARE rules via Subversion/CVS repositories? Ralph Seichter
• 2004/07/20 Bayes database problem Rogers, Zoë A.
• 2004/07/20 How to deliver all spam message to one account? d . deboni
• 2004/07/20 Re: SURBL And SpamCOP URI Jeff Chan
• 2004/07/20 Re: Catching more phishers - Not Really a SURBL Case Jesse Houwing
• 2004/07/20 Re: SURBL And SpamCOP URI Rakesh
• 2004/07/20 Re: some emails aren't scanned Dimitrios
• 2004/07/20 Test - ignore Jonathan Nichols
• 2004/07/20 Re: [RDJ] Is it broken? Daniel Quinlan
• 2004/07/20 Re: harsh image rules Hamie
• 2004/07/20 Re: [RDJ] Is it broken? Duncan Hill
• 2004/07/20 RE: some emails aren't scanned Dan Kohn
• 2004/07/19 Re: SURBL And SpamCOP URI John Andersen
• 2004/07/19 Re: [RDJ] Is it broken? LuKreme
• 2004/07/19 Re: Test spam for bigevil/evilnumbers/antidrug/SARE? Jeff Chan
• 2004/07/19 Re: RFC: sex site domain SURBL Jeff Chan
• 2004/07/19 Re: Catching more phishers - Not Really a SURBL Case David Hooton
• 2004/07/19 Re: RFC: sex site domain SURBL Loren Wilton
• 2004/07/19 Re: Test spam for bigevil/evilnumbers/antidrug/SARE? LuKreme
• 2004/07/19 Re: Catching more phishers - Not Really a SURBL Case Loren Wilton
• 2004/07/19 Re: SURBL And SpamCOP URI Jeff Chan
• 2004/07/19 rewrite_header LuKreme
• 2004/07/19 Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Re: RFC: sex site domain SURBL Jeff Chan
• 2004/07/19 Re: harsh image rules jdow
• 2004/07/19 Re: harsh image rules Jeff Chan
• 2004/07/19 Re: harsh image rules Graham Murray
• 2004/07/19 Re: Catching more phishers - Not Really a SURBL Case David Hooton
• 2004/07/19 Re: Test spam for bigevil/evilnumbers/antidrug/SARE? Matt Kettler
• 2004/07/19 Re: Test spam for bigevil/evilnumbers/antidrug/SARE? Ryan Thompson
• 2004/07/19 RE: [RDJ] Is it broken? Matt Yackley
• 2004/07/19 Test spam for bigevil/evilnumbers/antidrug/SARE? LuKreme
• 2004/07/19 sa-blacklist.current.uri.cf or sa-blacklist.current.bigevil.cf Bitz
• 2004/07/19 RE: [RDJ] Is it broken? Gary Smith
• 2004/07/19 Re: SURBL And SpamCOP URI Rakesh
• 2004/07/19 RE: Using BigEvil Robert Bartlett
• 2004/07/19 Re: [RDJ] Is it broken? Justin Mason
• 2004/07/19 Re: some emails aren't scanned Dimitrios
• 2004/07/19 RE: [RDJ] Is it broken? Gary Smith
• 2004/07/19 RE: [RDJ] Is it broken? Dan Kohn
• 2004/07/19 Re: Catching more phishers - Not Really a SURBL Case David B Funk
• 2004/07/19 Re: RFC: sex site domain SURBL Jeff Chan
• 2004/07/19 Re: Catching more phishers - Not Really a SURBL Case Jeff Chan
• 2004/07/19 Re: Catching more phishers - Not Really a SURBL Case Albert Whale
• 2004/07/19 FW: [RDJ] Is it broken? lists
• 2004/07/19 Re: [SURBL-Discuss] RE: 6dos data into ds.surbl.org Jeff Chan
• 2004/07/19 Re: sex.surbl.org (was: Re: include IP lookups in SURBL lists) David Hooton
• 2004/07/19 Re: [SURBL-Discuss] RE: 6dos data into ds.surbl.org David Hooton
• 2004/07/19 RE: [SURBL-Discuss] RE: 6dos data into ds.surbl.org Joseph Burford
• 2004/07/19 Re: [RDJ] Is it broken? Justin Mason
• 2004/07/19 RE: [RDJ] Is it broken? Chris Stone
• 2004/07/19 Re: Using BigEvil Bob McClure Jr
• 2004/07/19 Re: Using BigEvil Jeff Chan
• 2004/07/19 Re: RulesDuJour Updates Homer
• 2004/07/19 RE: [RDJ] Is it broken? Gary Smith
• 2004/07/19 RE: Using BigEvil Robert Bartlett
• 2004/07/19 Re: Using BigEvil Jeff Chan
• 2004/07/19 Using BigEvil Robert Bartlett
• 2004/07/19 Re: [SURBL-Discuss] RE: 6dos data into ds.surbl.org Jeff Chan
• 2004/07/19 Re: [RDJ] Is it broken? Fred
• 2004/07/19 Re: RulesDuJour Updates Homer
• 2004/07/19 Re: More on SpamCopURI busting tests Jeff Chan
• 2004/07/19 Re: More on SpamCopURI busting tests Bob McClure Jr
• 2004/07/19 Re: More on SpamCopURI busting tests Jeff Chan
• 2004/07/19 Re: SnipURL abused - do we need SA rules? Jesse Houwing
• 2004/07/19 Re: SnipURL abused - do we need SA rules? Jesse Houwing
• 2004/07/19 RE: More on SpamCopURI busting tests SRH-Lists
• 2004/07/19 Re: More on SpamCopURI busting tests Bob McClure Jr
• 2004/07/19 RE: SA 3.0 Maillog parser Dallas L. Engelken
• 2004/07/19 Re: More on SpamCopURI busting tests Jeff Chan
• 2004/07/19 Re: harsh image rules Jeff Chan
• 2004/07/19 Re: harsh image rules Jeff Chan
• 2004/07/19 More on SpamCopURI busting tests Bob McClure Jr
• 2004/07/19 Re: SnipURL abused - do we need SA rules? Jeff Chan
• 2004/07/19 RE: [RDJ] Is it broken? Gary Smith
• 2004/07/19 Re: very slow response times Jeff Chan
• 2004/07/19 Re[2]: SnipURL abused - do we need SA rules? Kelson Vibber
• 2004/07/19 Re: SURBL And SpamCOP URI Jeff Chan
• 2004/07/19 Re[2]: SnipURL abused - do we need SA rules? Pete McNeil
• 2004/07/19 [RDJ] Is it broken? Chris Santerre
• 2004/07/19 Re: SA 3.0 Maillog parser LuKreme
• 2004/07/19 Re: Wiki add please How to check a IMAP mailbox on another machine Ken Scott
• 2004/07/19 Re: harsh image rules Kenneth Porter
• 2004/07/19 RE: Wiki add please How to check a IMAP mailbox on another machine William Stearns
• 2004/07/19 RE: Wiki add please How to check a IMAP mailbox on another machine lists
• 2004/07/19 RE: Wiki add please How to check a IMAP mailbox on another machine lists
• 2004/07/19 Re: SnipURL abused - do we need SA rules? LuKreme
• 2004/07/19 Re: Wiki add please How to check a IMAP mailbox on another machine William Stearns
• 2004/07/19 Re: [RD] Bigevil, little help needed. LuKreme
• 2004/07/19 RE: Wiki add please How to check a IMAP mailbox on another machine Yackley, Matt
• 2004/07/19 Wiki add please How to check a IMAP mailbox on another machine lists
• 2004/07/19 Re: SnipURL abused - do we need SA rules? Kris Deugau
• 2004/07/19 Re: [RD] Bigevil, little help needed. LuKreme
• 2004/07/19 Re: harsh image rules LuKreme
• 2004/07/19 whitelist_from_rcvd Jared Priddy
• 2004/07/19 RulesDuJour Updates Jorge Valdes
• 2004/07/19 Re: harsh image rules LuKreme
• 2004/07/19 RE: [RD] Bigevil, little help needed. Chris Santerre
• 2004/07/19 RE: harsh image rules Geoff Soper
• 2004/07/19 Re: very slow response times Jon Gerdes
• 2004/07/19 Re: [RD] Bigevil, little help needed. LuKreme
• 2004/07/19 RE: harsh image rules Ryan Thompson
• 2004/07/19 Re: Catching more phishers Matt Kettler
• 2004/07/19 Re: SnipURL abused - do we need SA rules? Kelson Vibber
• 2004/07/19 RE: harsh image rules Chris Santerre
• 2004/07/19 RE: harsh image rules Geoff Soper
• 2004/07/19 RE: harsh image rules Chris Santerre
• 2004/07/19 Re: blocking bmp and zip files Michael W Cocke
• 2004/07/19 RE: harsh image rules Geoff Soper
• 2004/07/19 very slow response times Dana Holland
• 2004/07/19 RE: harsh image rules Chris Santerre
• 2004/07/19 Re: harsh image rules Hamie
• 2004/07/19 RE: Rules Du Jour Larry Rosenman
• 2004/07/19 SURBL And SpamCOP URI Rakesh
• 2004/07/19 [RD] Bigevil, little help needed. Chris Santerre
• 2004/07/19 RE: Rules Du Jour Gary Smith
• 2004/07/19 RE: sex.surbl.org (was: Re: include IP lookups in SURBL lists) Chris Santerre
• 2004/07/19 Rules Du Jour Don Newcomer
• 2004/07/19 RE: 6dos data into ds.surbl.org Chris Santerre
• 2004/07/19 problem with quota? Dave Stern - Former Rocket Scientist
• 2004/07/19 Re: Catching more phishers Albert Whale
• 2004/07/19 --lint with SA3.0 LuKreme
• 2004/07/18 Re: Catching more phishers Matt Kettler
• 2004/07/18 Re: Catching more phishers Lucas Albers
• 2004/07/18 Catching more phishers Albert Whale
• 2004/07/18 Re: blocking bmp and zip files ip.guy
• 2004/07/18 Re: blocking bmp and zip files LuKreme
• 2004/07/18 Re: blocking bmp and zip files ip.guy
• 2004/07/18 Re: blocking bmp and zip files Theo Van Dinter
• 2004/07/18 Re: Changes in SA 3.0? Theo Van Dinter
• 2004/07/18 Re: Changes in SA 3.0? LuKreme
• 2004/07/18 blocking bmp and zip files ip.guy
• 2004/07/18 RE: SA 3.0 Maillog parser Dallas L. Engelken
• 2004/07/18 Re: [SURBL-Discuss] 6dos data into ds.surbl.org Jeff Chan
• 2004/07/18 6dos data into ds.surbl.org Jeff Chan
• 2004/07/18 Re: How to Override Score Matt Kettler
• 2004/07/18 How to Override Score Bitz
• 2004/07/18 Re: SnipURL abused - do we need SA rules? Ralph Seichter
• 2004/07/18 Re: include IP lookups in SURBL lists Jeff Chan
• 2004/07/17 Re: sex.surbl.org (was: Re: include IP lookups in SURBL lists) Jeff Chan
• 2004/07/17 Re: sex.surbl.org (was: Re: include IP lookups in SURBL lists) Jeff Chan
• 2004/07/17 Re: ob.surbl.org FP Jeff Chan
• 2004/07/17 Re: New bigevil.cf segfaults SA Jeff Chan
• 2004/07/17 Re: how to use SURBL Jeff Chan
• 2004/07/17 Re: SURBL Kudos Jeff Chan
• 2004/07/17 Re: SURBL newbie questions Jeff Chan
• 2004/07/17 Re: SURBL newbie questions Jeff Chan
• 2004/07/17 Re: Unusual Bayes behaviour Rakesh
• 2004/07/17 Re: SpamCopURI redirect question Jeff Chan
• 2004/07/17 Re: SnipURL abused - do we need SA rules? Jeff Chan
• 2004/07/17 Re: some emails aren't scanned Tim Wesemann
• 2004/07/17 Re: disable auto-whitelist? Matt Kettler
• 2004/07/17 Re: SnipURL abused - do we need SA rules? Daniel Quinlan
• 2004/07/17 Re: harsh image rules Kenneth Porter
• 2004/07/17 Re: harsh image rules Kenneth Porter
• 2004/07/17 Re: some emails aren't scanned John
• 2004/07/17 Re: some emails aren't scanned John
• 2004/07/17 Re: some emails aren't scanned Dimitrios
• 2004/07/17 RE: disable auto-whitelist? Dan Kohn
• 2004/07/17 RE: some emails aren't scanned Dan Kohn
• 2004/07/17 Re: SnipURL abused - do we need SA rules? Bob McClure Jr
• 2004/07/17 Re: Unusual Bayes behaviour Matt Kettler
• 2004/07/17 Re: harsh image rules Geoff Soper
• 2004/07/17 Re: harsh image rules Geoff Soper
• 2004/07/17 Re: SnipURL abused - do we need SA rules? Jeff Chan
• 2004/07/17 Re: some emails aren't scanned Dimitrios
• 2004/07/17 Re: some emails aren't scanned Dimitrios
• 2004/07/17 Re: Broken spam Geoff Soper
• 2004/07/17 Unusual Bayes behaviour Rakesh
• 2004/07/17 Re: SnipURL abused - do we need SA rules? Kenneth Porter
• 2004/07/17 Re: .procmailrc problem Geoff Soper
• 2004/07/17 Re: SnipURL abused - do we need SA rules? Pete McNeil
• 2004/07/17 SnipURL abused - do we need SA rules? Ralph Seichter
• 2004/07/17 Re: Received Header Parsing Issue Nick Leverton
• 2004/07/17 disable auto-whitelist? Marc G. Fournier
• 2004/07/17 Re: some emails aren't scanned Scot L. Harris
• 2004/07/17 Re: harsh image rules Kenneth Porter
• 2004/07/17 Re: harsh image rules Loren Wilton
• 2004/07/17 Re: Broken spam Loren Wilton
• 2004/07/17 Re: some emails aren't scanned Loren Wilton
• 2004/07/17 Re: What the heck is chickenpox all about??? Loren Wilton

• Earlier messages
• Later messages