On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Bob George wrote: > Pat Traynor wrote: > > A lot of spam is slipping through. I was wondering how > dangerous it > > would be for me to bump up some of these scores. This is from a > > typical spam I've been getting: > > > > X-Spam-Level: *** > > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 > > tests=BAYES_50 [...] > > Are you training bayes with those that DO slip through? The "rules > du jour" set helped set things right as well (see archives) by > detecting some of the sneakier spam. This combination worked very > well for me, with no need to tweak any default scores.
Somehow I thought that bayes was a "single user" thing. i.e., if I do a great job training bayes, that'll help me fine. But it does nothing for the other people that receive mail on my machine. Am I wrong? --pat-- -- Pat Traynor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
