On Saturday, July 17, 2004, 10:47:09 AM, Ralph Seichter wrote: > I guess it was only a matter of time that spammers started using > SnipURL http://snipurl.com/ and the likes of it. Today I received a > message from the h*me off*ce d*gest knuckleheads about a "wonderful > opportunity", and the shmucks used a SnipURL redirector in their so- > called newsletter. Do you think it makes sense add weight for SnipURL > to the SpamAssassin core rules?
Perhaps better, please ask SnipURL to consider using SURBLs to deny access to spammers, as the Metamark.net shortening redirector service is doing: http://www.surbl.org/redirect.html Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
