On Friday, July 30, 2004, 1:16:59 AM, Johann Spies wrote:
> So far I did not see any reference to "spamcop" or "surbl" int
> /var/log/exim4/rejectlog which contains the spamassassin reports.
> A few more questions (I have read the Quickstart and FAQ but it is still
> not clear to me):
> 1. In which circumstances do I have to change
> /etc/mail/spamassassin/spamcop_uri.cf which was installed when I
> installed spamcopuri.
The sample config file uses only the original sc.surbl.org
list:
uri SPAMCOP_URI_RBL
eval:check_spamcop_uri_rbl('sc.surbl.org','127.0.0.2')
describe SPAMCOP_URI_RBL URI's domain appears in spamcop database at
sc.surbl.org
tflags SPAMCOP_URI_RBL net
score SPAMCOP_URI_RBL 3.0
If you would like to add some of the other lists, like
ob.surbl.org or ws.surbl.org then you would add rules
and scores for them also:
http://www.surbl.org/quickstart.html
uri WS_URI_RBL eval:check_spamcop_uri_rbl('ws.surbl.org','127.0.0.2')
describe WS_URI_RBL URI's domain appears in sa-blacklist
tflags WS_URI_RBL net
score WS_URI_RBL 3.0
uri OB_URI_RBL eval:check_spamcop_uri_rbl('ob.surbl.org','127.0.0.2')
describe OB_URI_RBL URI's domain appears in ob.surbl.org
tflags OB_URI_RBL net
score OB_URI_RBL 4.0
> 2. Am I correct in assuming that I do not have to update this rule
> because it receives it's data from sc.surbl.org?
Yes, that's correct. The data for SURBLs comes from DNS
resolution of the SURBL zone files.
> 3. Do I still use the rules I did before (other than bigevil.cf) in
> the same way? I have never used blacklists.cf.
Yes.
> 4. How does spamcopuri announce itself in the logs?
> Regards
> Johann
You should see rules like "SPAMCOP_URI_RBL" appear in the logs.
Please make sure you have network tests enabled.
Jeff C.
--
Jeff Chan
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.surbl.org/
