>-----Original Message----- >From: Johann Spies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 5:00 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: No SURBL entries in logs? > > >On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 05:38:31AM -0700, Jeff Chan wrote: >> On Monday, August 2, 2004, 4:09:26 AM, Johann Spies wrote: >> > Please excuse my short memory (or laziness). I have read the >> > documentation now and saw what the -L switch means. I had >that in the >> > spamd startup script. >> >> Are you seeing SURBL hits in your logs now? > >Yes, thanks! > >I am considering it to adjust the scores. The machine with surbl >catches less spam than the other two.
Huh? You're saying the server w/ SURBL gets more FNs? If so, what makes the other servers better? --Chris
