On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 11:41:44AM -0400, Chris Santerre wrote:
> >I am considering it to adjust the scores. The machine with surbl
> >catches less spam than the other two.
>
> Huh? You're saying the server w/ SURBL gets more FNs? If so, what
> makes the other servers better?
I don't think I can say for sure there more False Negatives.
The only difference between them is that two uses (the large)
bigevil.cf and one SURBL. All the other rules are similar on the
machines. Each one has it's own bayesian database and autolearning
and auto_whitelisting is switched off. SA-learn receives the same
messages on all three. For the past 24 hours the average number of
spam blocked and valid emails on those machines per minute was:
spam ham
1 - 7.90 16.69
2 - 6.63 18.00
3 - 6.96 20.84
Number 2 is using SURBL.
Regards
Johann
--
Johann Spies Telefoon: 021-808 4036
Informasietegnologie, Universiteit van Stellenbosch
"And not only so, but we glory in tribulations also;
knowing that tribulation worketh patience; And
patience, experience; and experience, hope."
Romans 5:3,4
