http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=joejob
http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&safe=active&q=joe+job&spell=1 {^_^} ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jon Fullmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, 2004 August, 07 10:11 Subject: Re: Log, but don't tell > First off, you guys are great. I mean that. I appreciate the quick > responses, and I think we're getting somewhere. You've been very patient > with someone who's perhaps more novice than he originally believed. > > With that in mind, quick question: what is a "joe job" (or "joejobber")? > I've heard the term used frequently, and I've probably seen it, but I don't > know what you're referring to. > > - Jon > > on 8/7/04 11:01 AM, Dougie Nisbet at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > On Saturday 07 August 2004 17:31, Michele: Blacknight Solutions wrote: > >> Bouncing spam creates extra network traffic that we could all do without. > >> As you seem to be aware of the problems with forged returned paths your > >> choice is not being dictated by simple ignorance. > > > > I'm intrigued. What if someone like the OP is the victim of a Joe Job, do they > > bounce the bounced mail that has been faked as being sent from them in the > > first place? I think my head is beginning to hurt. > >
