Hallo Tony, > Assuming that you're training only on any mistakes & unsures, then > both ham and spam should be set to default to 'discard' anyway. Is > it really that much of a problem to have these in the list when they > don't cause any extra work?
Well, that does only apply if the assumption is valid. I prefer to always train everything to keep my filter up2date. > Open-source is a scratch-your-own-itch world. It's not like we have > a great deal of time to work on SpamBayes, or that we're getting any > financial reward out of doing so. (Having more non-contributing > users is in some ways a net negative, because it just adds to the > support load). This is your point-of-view. And luckily most OS projects don't think this way. > So write one and submit a patch. However, you're wrong. Have you > read the comments from Mark that are linked to from that FAQ entry? > They discuss the difficulty of adding whitelisting (he's talking > about adding to the Outlook plug-in, but it mostly all applies to > sb_server as well). OK, my fault, i think i overrated the abilities of the developers. _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html
