That's interesting, Paulo. I have timeoutsmtpd at 600, and nothing specified
for idle-timeout-secs. Sam's having a look at a couple of my logs. I'll be
glad to try this out if Sam gives me the word (I don't want to mess up his
debugging efforts). I wonder if idle-timeout-secs is somehow not being
initialized/defaulted properly.

Thanks for the input Paulo.

Paulo Henrique wrote:
> I had a problem like this and decided putting the timeout from qmail
> less than the timeout from spamdyke, see:
> 
> cat /var/qmail/control/timeoutsmtpd
> 240
> grep idle-timeout-secs /var/qmail/control/spamdyke/spamdyke.conf
> idle-timeout-secs = 300
> 
> 
> 
> After that never had problem with the repetition of messages.
> 
> 2008/4/22 Eric Shubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>:
> 
>     I had a problem receiving a particular email message. It would
>     always send
>     the same amount of data, then timeout. The same amount of data was
>     sent/received with timeouts of 60 and 180 seconds.
> 
>     I logged the message (great little feature of spamdyke btw), and the end
>     part of the message log always shows:
>     <HR align="left" SIZE=1 color=black>
>     <div align="left"><font face="arial"
>     size="1">14072172</font></div></td></tr></TBODY></TABLE>
>     </BODY></HTML>
> 
>     FF> 04/22/2008 17:11:13
>     .
>     QUIT
> 
>     <FF  04/22/2008 17:11:13
>     421 Timeout. Talk faster next time.
> 
>     <XX  04/22/2008 17:11:33
>     250 ok 1208909493 qp 11949
>     221 doris.shubes.net <http://doris.shubes.net> - Welcome to Qmail
>     Toaster Ver. 1.3 SMTP Server
> 
>     04/22/2008 17:11:33 CLOSED
> 
> 
>     Here's the smtp log for the successful receipt (with no spamdyke):
>     04-22 17:21:13 tcpserver: pid 12162 from 208.46.47.130
>     <http://208.46.47.130>
>     04-22 17:21:13 tcpserver: ok 12162 doris:192.168.71.11:25
>     <http://192.168.71.11:25> :208.46.47.130::51303
>     04-22 17:21:13 CHKUSER accepted sender: from
>     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote
>     <rapport.mysurvey.com:unknown:208.46.47.130 <http://208.46.47.130>>
>     rcpt <> : sender accepted
>     04-22 17:21:13 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from
>     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote
>     <rapport.mysurvey.com:unknown:208.46.47.130 <http://208.46.47.130>>
>     rcpt <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> :
>     found existing recipient
>     04-22 17:21:34 simscan:[12162]:CLEAN (-6.20/99.00):20.2626s:April
>     Edition of
>     MySurvey.com Opinion
>     Matters:208.46.47.130:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>     04-22 17:21:34 tcpserver: end 12162 status 0
> 
> 
>     After receiving the entire message, I see this portion that was received
>     after the part logged by spamdyke:
>     <IMG
>     
> SRC="https://www.mysurvey.com/gems/gems_open_tracking.cfm?indid=14072172&cmpid=1105&r=1720290&rundate=22-APR-2008+11%3a52%3a55&z=67129618CF0844A786F0E0A6C20C49CD
>     
> <https://www.mysurvey.com/gems/gems_open_tracking.cfm?indid=14072172&cmpid=1105&r=1720290&rundate=22-APR-2008+11%3a52%3a55&z=67129618CF0844A786F0E0A6C20C49CD>"border="0"
>     width="1" height="1">
> 
>     ------=_Layout_Part_DC7E1BB5_1105_4DB3_BAE3_2A6208EB099A--
> 
> 
>     Any idea why this would timeout (consistently, like clockwork) with
>     spamdyke, but not without it? This message timed out all day long with
>     spamdyke, but was received successfully on the first attempt without
>     spamdyke. Did spamdyke somehow choke on the last bit?
> 
>     FWIW, it appears that the entire email was a bit hosed, as the html
>     did not
>     render properly in the client view (mac mail) once the entire
>     message was
>     received.
> 
>     --
>     -Eric 'shubes'
>     _______________________________________________
>     spamdyke-users mailing list
>     spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org <mailto:spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org>
>     http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Paulo Henrique Fonseca
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users


-- 
-Eric 'shubes'
_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

Reply via email to