OK, I've got this one figured out. I'll keep testing tonight and (hopefully) release 4.0.6 in the morning.
-- Sam Clippinger Sam Clippinger wrote: > No, I couldn't reproduce that one. I can't think of any reason why > spamdyke's debug/excessive output should ever be sent to the remote server. > > Could you send your configuration file and "run" file to me? It must be > something specific to your setup. > > -- Sam Clippinger > > Arthur Girardi wrote: > >> Hi Sam, >> >> Will that also solve the issue of smtp errors on the client-side? I >> couldn't find any log for those customers who had those errors, not >> even in the syslog. I did copy the error tho, if that may be of any >> help. Can reproduce that anytime too. >> >> And just to correct myself earlier, its not chunks of excessive >> output, but always the same line: >> >> EXCESSIVE(process_config_file()@configuration.c:3610): set >> configuration option full-log-dir from file /etc/spamdyke.conf, line >> 69: /path/to/spamdyke/full-log-dir >> >> This being the server's reply in the error message at client side. >> >> Arthur >> >> Citando Sam Clippinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> >> >>> I think I may have this one solved. I removed some code in version >>> 4.0.5 that I didn't think was necessary any longer, but it turns out I >>> wrote it for version 3.1.2 to prevent exactly this problem. Go figure. >>> >>> I've reverted that change and I'm running the test scripts now. If >>> everything checks out I'll release 4.0.6 in the morning. >>> >>> -- Sam Clippinger >>> >>> Arthur Girardi wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> I too noticed the high cpu usage by spamdyke in the 4.0.5 version. >>>> Like 6 or 7 spamdyke processes running at 100% cpu on a dual >>>> quad-core... >>>> >>>> Interesting enough, I noticed not all spamdyke did go 100%, only those >>>> that had some kind of attachment, a gif, jpg, a signature, whatever, >>>> encoded in base64. The message does finish successfully and life goes >>>> on, but I started having some slowdown complaints, and after this >>>> first post to the list, I saw I had the same issue. >>>> >>>> If you strace the process while it is hanging at high cpu, you'll see >>>> a lot of Timeouts mixed with reads and writes of what seems to be the >>>> content of the base64 attachment. >>>> >>>> Then I tried changing output from my normal verbose operation to >>>> excessive, and enabled full-log-dir, but just as I did that, cpu usage >>>> fell down, and clients started getting smtp error messages containing >>>> chunks of spamdyke's excessive output. >>>> >>>> I'm running spamdyke on a rhel5. >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> >>>> Arthur >>>> >>>> Citando Paulo Henrique <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi... >>>>> >>>>> 2008/10/14 Sam Clippinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> This is the first I've heard of this -- can you provide any more >>>>>> information about it? Did those spamdyke processes produce any log >>>>>> messages or errors? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> No errors. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Did they begin eating the CPU before or after >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> accepting/rejecting a message? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Apparently once the message is accepted. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Did you try turning on full logging to >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> see exactly what was going on? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Yet I did not. >>>>> >>>>> What OS are you running? >>>>> >>>>> Linux Slackware 12.1, kernel 2.6.24-5-smp >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> tks. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> -- Sam Clippinger >>>>>> >>>>>> Erald Troja wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I second your findings. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We reverted to 4.0.4 right away. >>>>>>> Did not report it as we were unable >>>>>>> to find a good explanation for it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The spamdyke processes were just lingering each consuming >>>>>>> between 70% to 100% of CPU. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------ >>>>>>> Erald Troja >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Paulo Henrique wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> since the spamdyke upgraded to 4.0.5, I noted that my servers working >>>>>>>> with a high load, the average of 0.65 and they were left to 3.5, >>>>>>>> someone noticed this problem? What may be happening? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> tks >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> spamdyke-users mailing list >>>>>>> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org >>>>>>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> spamdyke-users mailing list >>>>>> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org >>>>>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> "Muitos homens perdem a saúde para ganhar dinheiro, depois perdem o >>>>> dinheiro para ganhar a saúde. - Confúcio" >>>>> >>>>> Paulo Henrique Fonseca >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> spamdyke-users mailing list >>>>> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org >>>>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> spamdyke-users mailing list >>>> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org >>>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> spamdyke-users mailing list >>> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org >>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> spamdyke-users mailing list >> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org >> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users >> >> > _______________________________________________ > spamdyke-users mailing list > spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org > http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users > _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
