Thanks for your prompt answers. I have substituted all charges with 0s
and it worked well with both X!Tandem and TPP. It appears to be the
simplest fix so I will stick to it. Again - thanks!



On Apr 27, 11:08 am, Matthew Chambers <matt.chamber...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> The chargeStatePredictor filter in msconvert can override existing charge 
> states and put in multiple
> possible charge states for multiply charged spectra and charge=1 for singly 
> charged spectra (based
> on %TIC below the precursor m/z). It works fine with mzML but I'm not sure 
> how X!T would handle it
> or how it gets represented in mzXML. You could also just replace all charge 
> states with 0 and X!T
> would probably ignore them.
>
> -Matt
>
> On 4/27/2012 9:40 AM, polia...@med.umich.edu wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hi,
> > I am analyzing some old data from Velos that was acquired with charge
> > state screening during acquisition, i.e. charge state is determined
> > and stored in .raw file. However, we now want to search this data
> > without pre-determined charge state since it is often not accurately
> > assigned (this is just Velos without Orbi). Is there a way to make X!
> > Tandem disregard charge state in an mzXML? Just removing charge state
> > field in mzXML works for X!Tandem but we later have issues with TPP as
> > it fails to parse XML,
> > Thanks,
> > Anton.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"spctools-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to spctools-discuss@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
spctools-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.

Reply via email to