Michael Dolan wrote earlier today: > Where would you insert this to create correct SPDX data for Linux"? What > is the current "SPDX data for Linux" that is incorrect?
How do you describe the license of someone's copyrighted material who has granted the KES additional permission using SPDX syntax without "KES-Exception"? Just a quick click-around tour of cregit (which you linked to earlier, Mike): * Assuming cregit's accurate -- I found lots of code that I could lift from there and label as "GPL-2.0-only WITH KES-Exception". Adding some 15 minute shell scripting against Linux's Git tree showed: * Many files that currently say: "SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0" at the top, where both `git blame` and cregit report that most contributors have actually licensed "WITH KES-Exception", not just GPL-2.0. Does SPDX have a "threshold" of how much copyright must be licensed under a specific exception before listing it? I've not heard of such a litmus test before, but if one exists, please do share it. -- Bradley M. Kuhn Pls. support the charity where I work, Software Freedom Conservancy: https://sfconservancy.org/supporter/ -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#2473): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-legal/message/2473 Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/28714103/21656 Group Owner: spdx-legal+ow...@lists.spdx.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-legal/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-