On 1/30/07, Josh Hoyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: *snip* > While it is true that since the link relationship names changed, the > "openid2" is technically redundant, I think it is much clearer to > everybody what is going on if the link relationship contains the > version number. If the protocol version were to keep changing, I'd > argue for a different solution.
Sure, that's good enough reason. Since html discovery is not really the preferred method anyway, I don't think the openid2.* links should stand in the way of finalizing the spec :) -Rowan _______________________________________________ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
