On 4/6/07 6:07 PM, "Dick Hardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If anyone implementing would like to do something different, then I'd > welcome additional discussion, otherwise I think we should be able to > move forward with the proposal.
For what it's worth, as an implementer... I think it makes sense to come to agreement within the OpenID community and get something working first. While I appreciate the issues involved with having multiple protocols and attribute definitions, I worry that if this becomes coupled to other efforts it would cause delays. Better to at least come to that table with a sound version of what we think "works". Given that, discussing it here (openid.net) seems natural. --brian _______________________________________________ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
