On 2012-07-04, Kevin Hunter wrote:
> At 3:52am -0400 Sun, 01 Jul 2012, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> On 2012-06-28, Kevin Hunter wrote:
>>> ReST input Output
>>> ---------- ------
>>> ``'''`` "'
>>> ``\'''``, \"'
>>> ``'\''``, '\",
>>> ``''\'``, "\',
>>> ``'``\ ``'``\ ``'`` '''
>> It seems like the "beautifier" uses typographic quotes ('' -> “) even in
>> inline literals. This is either some setup problem at your site or a
>> Sphinx bug. Try to disable the quote conversion.
> I actually appreciate the beautifier, and it's only for the latexpdf
> output.
> I think the issue is LaTeX interpreting it,
...
Yes, if it affects only the latexpdf output, maybe it is not the
beautifier. Can you post what ``'''`` looks like in the LaTeX source?
The Docutils latex writer translates it to ::
\texttt{'{}'{}'}
With
# Break up input ligatures e.g. '--' to '-{}-'.
if not self.is_xetex: # Not required with xetex/luatex
separate_chars = '-'
# In monospace-font, we also separate ',,', '``' and "''" and some
# other characters which can't occur in non-literal text.
if self.literal:
separate_chars += ',`\'"<>'
for char in separate_chars * 2:
# Do it twice ("* 2") because otherwise we would replace
# '---' by '-{}--'.
text = text.replace(char + char, char + '{}' + char)
in LaTeXTranslator.encode().
But Sphinx uses it's own fork...
Günter
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sphinx-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-dev?hl=en.
