Hi Baruch, On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Baruch Siach <bar...@tkos.co.il> wrote: >> Though the spi_ prefix seems redundant considering the files are in >> 'spi' directory. >> Just a thought, no objection. > > When looking at the list of loaded modules (e.g. in an Oops message), the name > "spi_xilinx" is much more meaningful than just "xilinx", for example. Good catch. Perhaps we could get Makefile to build modules with spi_ prefix. Just like USB gadgets do ?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with vRanger. Installation's a snap, and flexible recovery options mean your data is safe, secure and there when you need it. Discover what all the cheering's about. Get your free trial download today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-dev2dev2 _______________________________________________ spi-devel-general mailing list spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general
