On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Jassi Brar <jassisinghb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Baruch, > > On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Baruch Siach <bar...@tkos.co.il> wrote: >>> Though the spi_ prefix seems redundant considering the files are in >>> 'spi' directory. >>> Just a thought, no objection. >> >> When looking at the list of loaded modules (e.g. in an Oops message), the >> name >> "spi_xilinx" is much more meaningful than just "xilinx", for example. > Good catch. > Perhaps we could get Makefile to build modules with spi_ prefix. Just > like USB gadgets do ?
I don't think it's worth mucking about with <module_name>-y := filename.o when the filename can just be made the same as the module name. g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with vRanger. Installation's a snap, and flexible recovery options mean your data is safe, secure and there when you need it. Discover what all the cheering's about. Get your free trial download today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-dev2dev2 _______________________________________________ spi-devel-general mailing list spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general
