Jimmy Kaplowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not going to address your main point above in this email, but the > recent meeting announcements, including the 3-day advance notice for the > December meeting, did have more than 0% information on the agenda. [...]
What's the point of posting the above? The previous post was accurate: some recent months were 0%s - no announcement at all, for various reasons, and the agendas were not linked from SPI's home page or meetings page. That included November (configuration problem at lists.spi-inc.org and notice too late to notice, correct and retry in time AIUI) and some others in 2006. December's http://lists.spi-inc.org/pipermail/spi-announce/2006/000140.html "At time of writing, two motions have been raised, and there is one set of minutes to approve." was indeed a little more than 0%. There was a URL for the agenda, but agenda URL content used to get edited right up to the meeting (not sure if that still happens). Regards, -- MJ Ray - see/vidu http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Somerset, England. Work/Laborejo: http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ IRC/Jabber/SIP: on request/peteble. _______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
