On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 03:52:08PM +0000, MJ Ray wrote: > Jimmy Kaplowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm not going to address your main point above in this email, but the > > recent meeting announcements, including the 3-day advance notice for the > > December meeting, did have more than 0% information on the agenda. [...] > > December's http://lists.spi-inc.org/pipermail/spi-announce/2006/000140.html > "At time of writing, two motions have been raised, and there is one > set of minutes to approve." was indeed a little more than 0%. There > was a URL for the agenda, but agenda URL content used to get edited > right up to the meeting (not sure if that still happens). >
So, if the agenda shoudn't get edited right up until the meeting, as you seem to be arguing for, then there should be a cutoff for adding things to the agenda. Neil -- Neil McGovern Secretary, Software in the Public Interest, Inc.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
