On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 16:00 +0000, Neil McGovern wrote: > On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 03:52:08PM +0000, MJ Ray wrote: > > Jimmy Kaplowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm not going to address your main point above in this email, but the > > > recent meeting announcements, including the 3-day advance notice for the > > > December meeting, did have more than 0% information on the agenda. [...] > > > > December's http://lists.spi-inc.org/pipermail/spi-announce/2006/000140.html > > "At time of writing, two motions have been raised, and there is one > > set of minutes to approve." was indeed a little more than 0%. There > > was a URL for the agenda, but agenda URL content used to get edited > > right up to the meeting (not sure if that still happens). > > > > So, if the agenda shoudn't get edited right up until the meeting, as you > seem to be arguing for, then there should be a cutoff for adding things > to the agenda.
As a repeat, I don't think the Agenda should be modified up to the minute. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > Neil > _______________________________________________ > Spi-general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate _______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
