Alvaro et al, Had I seen Stefano's email prior to completing my QA review for this draft, I would have included that WG adoption should wait until after the WG has had a chance to review the disclosure.
Thanks, Andy On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Stefano Previdi (sprevidi) < sprev...@cisco.com> wrote: > IPR is in the process of being disclosed. > > > Thanks. > s. > > > On Sep 24, 2014, at 3:03 PM, Alvaro Retana (aretana) wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > In parallel to the WG Adoption Call for this draft, I want to formally > ask the authors (no additional contributors are listed in the latest > version of the draft) to please respond to this message indicating whether > or not you are aware of any relevant IPR beyond what has been already > disclosed. The draft will not progress (pending the results of the WG > Adoption Call) until we have received a response from each author. > > > > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=document_search&id=draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing > > > > Thanks! > > > > Alvaro. > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > spring@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
