Hi Andrew, All, the IPR disclosed are related to the content of both documents: draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-04.txt draft-filsfils-rtgwg-segment-routing-01.txt
Should we re-issue an IPR disclosure ? s. On Oct 18, 2014, at 9:18 PM, Andrew G. Malis wrote: > Alvaro, > > Not to be a pain about this, but I just did a comparison between > draft-filsfils-rtgwg-segment-routing-01.txt and > draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-04.txt, and the changes are quite > impressive, a great majority of the text in the older draft is either missing > or changed in the newer draft. You can see for yourself by clicking on > http://tinyurl.com/q2ykstg . I would appreciate it if the patent holder could > update their declaration to the current draft, or publicly state whether or > not the declaration still applies to draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-04 > . > > Thanks, > Andy > > On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 10:23 PM, Alvaro Retana (aretana) <aret...@cisco.com> > wrote: > On 10/7/14, 11:26 AM, "Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <sprev...@cisco.com> > wrote: > > >IPR is in the process of being disclosed. > > The IPR was filed on Oct/7, but it was done against > draft-filsfils-rtgwg-segment-routing, which is the precursor of this > draft. The filing is ok, it just took me a while to find it. > > For the WG reference: http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2457/ > > > Authors: We still haven¹t received an explicit answer form Clarence, > Ahmed, Stephane, Igor, Wim and Ed. [Note that some of you may have > replied for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-mpls..] It would be > very nice if we can close on this requirement by Oct/23 so (if adopted) we > have time to publish the WG-titled document before the deadline. > > Thanks! > > Alvaro. > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > spring@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring > _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
