Hi Ahmed,
On 10/8/15, 8:18 PM, "Ahmed Bashandy (bashandy)" <basha...@cisco.com> wrote: > >if I understand you reply to Peter correctly, does this means that >multi-prefix SID should not be leaked outside its originating area? [Pushpasis] For backward-compatibility with classic IGP, prefix should be re-advertised.. But prefix-sid sub-tlv should not be propagated… Thanks -Pushpasis > >Ahmed > > >On 10/8/2015 6:11 AM, Pushpasis Sarkar wrote: >> Hi Peter, >> >> >> >> >> On 10/8/15, 6:03 PM, "Peter Psenak" <ppse...@cisco.com> wrote: >> >>> how do you envision to find out the node originating a prefix in case of >>> inter-area prefixe? >> [Pushpasis] The ABR on the originating area/level should be able to detect >> the anomaly like other nodes in the same area/level and block >> re-advertisement. >> >> Thanks >> -Pushpasis >> _______________________________________________ >> spring mailing list >> spring@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring > _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
