Hi:
I've reviewed this document and believe it is ready for publication. Thanks Regards … Zafar From: Idr <idr-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Susan Hares <sha...@ndzh.com> Date: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 6:34 PM To: "i...@ietf.org" <i...@ietf.org> Cc: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org> Subject: [Idr] IDR WG 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe - (2/15/2017 to 3/1/2017) This begins a 2 week IDR WG last call on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe from (2/15 to 3/1/2017) There are two implementations describe on the wiki at: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe%20 The two implementation are from Cisco IOS-XR release 6.0.2 and Cisco Nexus Switch N9000/N3000 platforms running NX-OS 7.0(3)I1(1) or greater. The authors will indicate on the list and in the wiki the following information : 1) Were these implementations separate implementations? 2) What were the results of the interoperability tests? This work is linked to the draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe work in the SPRING WG. Based on the two drafts, the WG should might consider: 1) Is there need for this work in deployments in networks/ 2) Is this technically ready for publication? 3) Does it fit with the spring informational draft? For the ease of reference the web references are below: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe/ Sue Hares
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
