On 7/9/19 20:10, Zafar Ali (zali) wrote: [....] > > Rough consensus and running code... But we work by rough consensus. > > Running code that explicitly goes against consensus is no IETF standard > at al. > > > > [ZA] Please refer to section 3 of SRv6 deployment > draft, > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-matsushima-spring-srv6-deployment-status-01#section-3. > It > provides some details on the *Significant industry collaboration that > led to SRv6 standardization. SRv6 standardization went through* the > rigorous IETF process (some may say much more rigorous than typically > done at IETF).
The rigurous IETF process says that you cannot do EH insertion. And you are insisting in circumventing that process. Thanks, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
