Ron, > On Nov 30, 2019, at 12:36 PM, Ron Bonica > <rbonica=40juniper....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > Pablo, > > > > Consider the packet (SA,DA) (S3, S2, S1; SL) where: > > > > • SA is link-local (fe80) > • DA, S3, S2, and S1 are all END.X > > > Section 4.2 suggests that this packet will be delivered over multiple hops to > its destination, regardless of its link-local source address.
I would think that RFC2460 Section 2.5.6. "Link-Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses” covers this: Link-Local addresses are for use on a single link. Link-Local addresses have the following format: | 10 | | bits | 54 bits | 64 bits | +----------+-------------------------+----------------------------+ |1111111010| 0 | interface ID | +----------+-------------------------+----------------------------+ Link-Local addresses are designed to be used for addressing on a single link for purposes such as automatic address configuration, neighbor discovery, or when no routers are present. Routers must not forward any packets with Link-Local source or destination addresses to other links. Bob > > > > Is this the case? > > > > Ron > > > > > > > > > > > Juniper Business Use Only > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > spring@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
