Brian,
Draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming does NOT have any text that proposes
SRH insertion.
The text you are pointing in Section 8.2 uses the word "Insert" in a different
context that has nothing to do with SRH insertion. I have replaced the word
insert throughout the entire draft to avoid this kind of confusions (rev06).
Thank you,
Pablo.
-----Original Message-----
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, 10 December 2019 at 20:37
To: "bruno.decra...@orange.com" <bruno.decra...@orange.com>, Fernando Gont
<ferna...@gont.com.ar>
Cc: Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper....@dmarc.ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org"
<spring@ietf.org>, "6...@ietf.org" <6...@ietf.org>, Suresh Krishnan
<suresh.krish...@gmail.com>, draft-voyer-6man-extension-header-insertion
<draft-voyer-6man-extension-header-insert...@ietf.org>,
draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
<draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programm...@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [spring] Question about SRv6 Insert function
> Situation has changed since this email: the network programming draft has
now removed text related to SRH insertion.
> Please comment on the text if you see text related to SRH insertion.
For example:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-05#section-8.2
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
