Hi WG, I support adoption on this work, it is in good shape to be adopted to be in the working group control. Hope the authors/WG find these comments useful -
(1) I would like to see this work provide more guidance for the protocol extensions - - Virtual network identifiers and its scope - Identifiers for resource partition - Virtual network creation/deletion/modify (also recompute because of network or resource changes) - manageability consideration wrt to configuring resource-aware SIDs/virtual networks (2) Can I have a mix of resource-aware SIDs and normal SIDs in an SR Path? Worth expanding on this. (3) Worth expanding on the dynamic allocation of SIDs by network nodes in section 3. (4) SR Policy should also need to be Virtual-network-aware and how steering happens to a VN-aware SR policy could be clarified. Thanks! Dhruv On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 4:47 PM James Guichard <james.n.guich...@futurewei.com> wrote: > > Dear WG: > > > > This email begins a 2 week WG adoption call for > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn/ > ending Wednesday 29th July 2020. > > > > Please speak up if you support or oppose adopting this document into the WG. > Please also provide comments/reasons for that support (or lack thereof). > Silence will not be considered consent. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Jim, Joel & Bruno > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > spring@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
