Hi Dhruv, Thanks for your support and comments. Please see some replies inline:
> -----Original Message----- > From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody > Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2020 1:28 AM > To: James Guichard <james.n.guich...@futurewei.com> > Cc: spring@ietf.org; spring-cha...@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for > draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn > > Hi WG, > > I support adoption on this work, it is in good shape to be adopted to be in > the > working group control. Hope the authors/WG find these comments useful - > > (1) I would like to see this work provide more guidance for the protocol > extensions - > - Virtual network identifiers and its scope > - Identifiers for resource partition > - Virtual network creation/deletion/modify (also recompute because of > network or resource changes) > - manageability consideration wrt to configuring resource-aware SIDs/virtual > networks Agree that some more information about the above could be provided in the document, and some may be specified in the corresponding control plane drafts. > > (2) Can I have a mix of resource-aware SIDs and normal SIDs in an SR Path? > Worth expanding on this. Yes it is possible to have them mixed in SR path, the usage is up to the requirement and policy. > > (3) Worth expanding on the dynamic allocation of SIDs by network nodes in > section 3. OK. > > (4) SR Policy should also need to be Virtual-network-aware and how steering > happens to a VN-aware SR policy could be clarified. Yes, SR policy with virtual network constraints is mentioned in 4.3, further clarification could be added. Best regards, Jie > > Thanks! > Dhruv > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 4:47 PM James Guichard > <james.n.guich...@futurewei.com> wrote: > > > > Dear WG: > > > > > > > > This email begins a 2 week WG adoption call for > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn/ > ending Wednesday 29th July 2020. > > > > > > > > Please speak up if you support or oppose adopting this document into the > WG. Please also provide comments/reasons for that support (or lack thereof). > Silence will not be considered consent. > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > Jim, Joel & Bruno > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > spring mailing list > > spring@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > spring@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
