> > Could the SRH be carried directly after the Ethernet header, similar > to how MPLS labels are? >
Spot on ! Thank you for this question/point. And if so could you be so kind and elaborate why would it be needed to define anything at all rather than just using SR-MPLS only ? Your suggestion makes it very clear that you simply do not appreciate (or understand) the power and value of the SRv6 concept. Thank you, R.
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
