Hi WG, Chairs, I support the WG adoption of this draft. It is a well written draft that describes an important use-case of circuit-style SRTE.
Thanks, Rakesh From: IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-re...@ietf.org> Date: Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 10:04 AM To: draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-pol...@ietf.org <draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-pol...@ietf.org>, spring-cha...@ietf.org <spring-cha...@ietf.org>, spring@ietf.org <spring@ietf.org> Subject: [**EXTERNAL**] The SPRING WG has placed draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy in state "Candidate for WG Adoption" The SPRING WG has placed draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy in state Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Joel Halpern) The document is available at https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy/__;!!OSsGDw!PrF5MLj2VoK47BuWO76oeewImBaGMafe294qNONXqhmq7i57ixXHdL_zK2azlh1DsID1fgczKQ2sDmGvgCW8AZU$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy/__;!!OSsGDw!PrF5MLj2VoK47BuWO76oeewImBaGMafe294qNONXqhmq7i57ixXHdL_zK2azlh1DsID1fgczKQ2sDmGvgCW8AZU$> [datatracker[.]ietf[.]org] Comment: This starts a two week adoption call for the subject draft. Please speak up if you support or object to WG adoption. Two notes: 1) WG adoption is the start of the process. The basic question is whether you agree that the subject is worth the working group time to work on, and whether this represents a good starting point for the work. 2) Please include explanation for your view. Yes or no are not very helpful answers, as this is not a vote but an evaluation of support and concerns. Thank you, Joel (for the WG Chairs) We expect to close this call at the end of May, 2023.
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
