I think we can close issue 1.
I agree the editors said that "All SIDs of the SRv6 dataplane can co-exist in
the same SRH. This make SRv6 a single, consistent dataplane solution". There
were some interop tests in the document.
Regards,
Aihua Liu
Original
From: JoelHalpern <j...@joelhalpern.com>
To: SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>;
Date: 2023年08月01日 05:08
Subject: [spring] Issue 1 regarding draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
As per the discussions on list and at IETF 117, the SPRING WG chairs (myself
and Alvaro specifically) are attempting to determine if we can close the open
issues regarding
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression/ The
editors have entered proposed resolutions for all open issues. This email is
to determine if the working group considers issue 1 closable.
Issue 1 reads:
Given that the working group has said that it wants to standardize one data
plane solution, and given that the document contains multiple SRv6 EndPoint
behaviors that some WG members have stated are multiple data plane solutions,
the working group will address whether this is valid and coherent with its one
data plane solution objective.
The editors have entered:
All SIDs of the SRv6 dataplane (defined in this document and in other
documents) can co-exist in the same SRH. This make SRv6 a single, consistent
dataplane solution.
Please speak up if you agree this resolves this issue, or if you consider that
it does not resolve the issue. Objections (and even support if practical)
should be specific as to the technical grounds for the statement. Silence will
not be considered consent.
This call will run for 3 weeks to allow time for at least some people's August
vacations and in hopes fo getting a clear reading from the WG.
Separate calls for other issues will be issued on a schedule that the chairs
have selected to try to balance getting sufficient focus with getting this
done, as it has been a long time.
Note that if the WG agrees that all issues may be marked as closed, the chairs
anticipate issuing the WG last call shortly after that is determined. Speaking
up early will help us in all dimensions. If we determine that not all issues
can be marked as closed, the chairs will work with the document editors to
determine suitable next steps.
Thank you,
Joel
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
