In my opinion the suggested approach is the most reasonable approach at this point, and therefore the issue can be closed.
Cheers, Tal. On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 12:08 AM Joel Halpern <j...@joelhalpern.com> wrote: > > As per the discussions on list and at IETF 117, the SPRING WG chairs (myself > and Alvaro specifically) are attempting to determine if we can close the open > issues regarding > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression/ The > editors have entered proposed resolutions for all open issues. This email is > to determine if the working group considers issue 1 closable. > > Issue 1 reads: > > Given that the working group has said that it wants to standardize one > data plane solution, and given that the document contains multiple SRv6 > EndPoint behaviors that some WG members have stated are multiple data > plane solutions, the working group will address whether this is valid > and coherent with its one data plane solution objective. > > The editors have entered: > > All SIDs of the SRv6 dataplane (defined in this document and in other > documents) can co-exist in the same SRH. This make SRv6 a single, consistent > dataplane solution. > > Please speak up if you agree this resolves this issue, or if you consider > that it does not resolve the issue. Objections (and even support if > practical) should be specific as to the technical grounds for the statement. > Silence will not be considered consent. > > This call will run for 3 weeks to allow time for at least some people's > August vacations and in hopes fo getting a clear reading from the WG. > > Separate calls for other issues will be issued on a schedule that the chairs > have selected to try to balance getting sufficient focus with getting this > done, as it has been a long time. > > Note that if the WG agrees that all issues may be marked as closed, the > chairs anticipate issuing the WG last call shortly after that is determined. > Speaking up early will help us in all dimensions. If we determine that not > all issues can be marked as closed, the chairs will work with the document > editors to determine suitable next steps. > > Thank you, > > Joel > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > spring@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
