If any allocation had been made (early or otherwise), I'd see it here
https://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-ipv6-special-registry/iana-ipv6-special-registry.xhtml
and here
https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-unicast-address-assignments/ipv6-unicast-address-assignments.xhtml
right?
A
-----Original Message-----
From: ipv6 <ipv6-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Michael Richardson
Sent: 04 April 2024 19:43
To: Tom Herbert <t...@herbertland.com>
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org; SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>; 6man
<i...@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPv6] Subject: Mandating SRH when using C-SIDs
(draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression)
Tom Herbert <t...@herbertland.com> wrote:
>> It wouldn't be that weird to have the new SID block in the source
>> code, with an override from the command line. No weirder than port
>> 23==telnet.
>>
> Michael,
> 23 is well known port number registered with IANA? Is the SID block a
> globally reserved address space?
My understanding is that it is/will be.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-sids/
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-6man-sids-06.html#name-iana-considerations
says:
Address Block: 5f00::/16
Name: Segment Routing (SRv6) SIDs
RFC: This document
I think that this was done via Early Allocation, but I could be wrong.
The document is still with the IESG, I guess. I thought it had passed.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
