Suresh,
The prefix allocated in draft-ietf-6man-sids is not required to be used. For
example, from the Abstract:
This document allocates and makes a dedicated prefix available for SRv6
SIDs.
There is not a MUST be used.
Bob
> On Apr 4, 2024, at 12:44 PM, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krish...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Adrian,
>
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 3:11 PM Adrian Farrel <adr...@olddog.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> If any allocation had been made (early or otherwise), I'd see it here
>> https://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-ipv6-special-registry/iana-ipv6-special-registry.xhtml
>> and here
>> https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-unicast-address-assignments/ipv6-unicast-address-assignments.xhtml
>> right?
>
> Correct. There was no early allocation requested. The allocation will
> happen after the approval of draft-ietf-6man-sids. The draft has text
> to update both of the registries you mentioned above.
>
> Thanks
> Suresh
>
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
