Bob Hinden <bob.hin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Suresh,
> The prefix allocated in draft-ietf-6man-sids is not required to be
> used. For example, from the Abstract:
> This document allocates and makes a dedicated prefix available for
> SRv6 SIDs.
> There is not a MUST be used.
Similiarly, you don't have to run telnet on port 23.
But, a tool could well assume traffic on port 23 is telnet, and traffic to
the 6man-sids allocation is SRv6. If someone has used a different
port/address, then they can tell the tool that.
(Why is the 5f00::/16 in the document, if that's not allocated? I'd expect
the document to say TBD)
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
