Hi Sue and WG, I support the publication of this document. My answer to all three questions is yes.
Yujia Susan Hares <[email protected]> 于2026年5月11日周一 20:34写道： > > This begins a 3-week WG LC for > draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sr-epe-over-l2bundle-02.txt (5/11 to 5/31/2026). > > > > This document describes how BGP-LS can support Segment Routing BGP Egress > Peer Engineering by updating RFC9085 to allow the L2 Bundle > > Member Attributes TLV to be added to the BGP-LS Attribute associated with the > Link NLRI of BGP peering link. > > > > This draft is being cross-posted to Spring to confirm that this draft aligns > with Spring’s goals for SR-EPE. If you believe this does not represent > Spring’s plan for SR-EPE over L2 Bundled links, please reply to this email. > The PCE and srv6ops chairs have been copied in case they wish to inform their > WGs. > > > > The authors of this draft should reply to this email with an IPR statement > regarding this document. > > > > The IDR WG LC should consider: > > > > 1) Is this BGP-LS addition technically correct? > > 2) Is this document ready for publication? > > 3) Will it aid the deployment of BGP SR EPE in networks? > > > > Cheerily, Sue Hares > > _______________________________________________ > Idr mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
