Hi all,
I have reviewed this draft and support the publication of it.
1) Is this BGP-LS addition technically correct? Yes.
2) Is this document ready for publication? Yes.
3) Will it aid the deployment of BGP SR EPE in networks? Yes.
Best Regards,
Wei
Original
From: Susan Hares <[email protected]>
Date: 2026-05-11 20:33
To: idr <[email protected]>, spring <[email protected]>
Cc: pce-chairs <[email protected]>, [email protected]
<[email protected]>
Subject: [Idr] [BGP-LS] draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sr-epe-over-l2bundle-02 - WG LC
(5/11/2026 to 5/31/2026) - 3 week WG LC
This begins a 3-week WG LC for
draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sr-epe-over-l2bundle-02.txt (5/11 to 5/31/2026).
This document describes how BGP-LS can support Segment Routing BGP Egress Peer
Engineering by updating RFC9085 to allow the L2 Bundle
Member Attributes TLV to be added to the BGP-LS Attribute associated with the
Link NLRI of BGP peering link.
This draft is being cross-posted to Spring to confirm that this draft aligns
with Spring’s goals for SR-EPE. If you believe this does not represent
Spring’s plan for SR-EPE over L2 Bundled links, please reply to this email.
The PCE and srv6ops chairs have been copied in case they wish to inform
their WGs.
The authors of this draft should reply to this email with an IPR statement
regarding this document.
The IDR WG LC should consider:
1) Is this BGP-LS addition technically correct?
2) Is this document ready for publication?
3) Will it aid the deployment of BGP SR EPE in networks?
Cheerily, Sue Hares _______________________________________________
spring mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
