We have never used one for an entire facility unless we could do it with
2-1/" prv. The relief valves really can create a lot of problems and we have
seen them not work at all and no one know for long periods of time. 

You can get 500 gpm out of 2-1/2" PRV so we try to stay with them.

Are you talking about a PRV or a Clay Valve being unreliable?

PRV's usually relax over time.  That is why the requirement is to limit the
pressure to 165 psi on the system side of the valve.


Living Water Fire Protection, LLC
1160 McKenzie Road
Cantonment, FL 32533
850-937-1850
Fax: 850-937-1852


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd Williams
- work
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 12:19 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: pump tricks


>Greg McGahan wrote...
>
>We do not use Relief valves any more. We rely on the proper rated fittings
>and Pressure Reducing Valves. The relief valves we have seen do not operate
>quickly enough to save the system from being exposed to higher pressure and
>they discharge so much water that they destroy property.
>
>

Interesting. I am working on a project where the relief valve was 
removed and replaced with a PRV. The PRV has become such a nightmare 
since we can't reliably set it and just don't trust it to work right, 
that we are replacing it with a standard relief valve.  What is you 
experience with PRVs over time? What kind of maintenance are you 
doing with them?


Todd G. Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, Connecticut
860-535-2080
www.fpdc.com 

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

Reply via email to