Approximately a year after the prohibition against gridded dry systems appeared in NFPA 13 (I think 1986 but I could be wrong). I went to work for one of the manufacturers that is now part of TYCO. One of the first complaints I received as the new technical service manager was; WHY WON"T YOUR @&%$&@ VALVE TRIP IN TIME SO I GET WATER TO THE INSPECTORS TEST IN 60 SECONDS? I Then proceeded to try to get information as to the system configuration. The answer was 6" Crossmain 2" lines and a 4" gang drain. When I explained to him that what he was describing was a DRY GRID. Oh no he said dry grids were not allowed, but there was nothing in the code limiting the size of the gang drain and/or precluding their use in the calculations. This was the first of many similar calls I received over the next year or two. So I sent a proposal to the NFPA 13 committee suggesting that gang drain sizes be limited to 1", a check valve be installed at the tie in point to the drain line and the drain line be excluded from the calculations. They excepted the 1" size limit and excluding the drains from the calculations. They rejected the check valves as being too costly and something else to go wrong.

Richard L. Mote
Designer
Rowe Sprinkler Systems, Inc



----- Original Message ----- From: "Roland Huggins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: Gang Drain for Attic Dry System


It IS black and white. That's what I meant by the drain requirement trumping the grid restriction.

Roland

On Jun 28, 2007, at 10:33 AM, Todd Williams - work wrote:

Am I missing something here? 8.15.2.5.3.4 states: 'Tie-in drains SHALL be provided for multiple adjacent trapped branch lines.....'. Shall is just a grammatically correct way of saying y'gotta. If you have the multiple adjacent trapped branch lines, they have to be connected with a tie-in drain. Section 14.4.4.5 says not to include them in hydraulic calculations. To me, that's a pretty open and shut deal. Does it create a gridded dry system, technically yes, but to me, this section says that this arrangement is allowed. Keep in mind that the cross sectional area of 1" pipe is roughly 1/4 of the CSA of 2" and 1/16th of 4". That creates a very different scenario than say 4" and 3" where the ratio is 9/16. It would be interesting to check trip times of a system with the tie-in drains attached and one where they are plugged off.

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to