George,

 

It bothers me a lot because the first fire I investigated in 1993 had a
rock in the orifice of the sprinkler over the deep fat fryer where the
fire started that opened over 80 sprinklers.  I have seen significant $
losses when grass (green), asphalt, twigs, and rocks get into the
sprinkler system and the domestic equipment (ice maker, dishwasher, hot
water heater, and so on) because the underground hasn't been flushed
properly.  It costs more to rip them out and clean them out then put
them in the first time.

 

Our bid documents require the flushing and testing in accordance with 13
and 24 before the sprinkler contractor connects (for our liability and
to protect the sprinkler contractor).  Unfortunately the AHJ's don't
enforce this, the general contractors don't enforce it, and in general
the sprinkler systems get connected anyway.  In addition, our plan
reviews require completed u.g. certificates before the C.O. is
completed.  The u.g. certificates are rarely furnished.

 

I used to project manage sprinkler and special system installation more
than I do now, and it frequently included u.g.  I often used the same
u.g. contractor throughout the Midwest and he ALWAYS told me, I never
flush and test u.g. that way.  Every time I'd tell him, you always do
for me.  Fortunately, my client allowed me to make sure the testing was
completed and I would watch every time to see it done.  So, apparently
the "never flush and test" is the norm, unless someone forces the issue.
As usual, enforcement seems to be the missing link.

 

Scott   

 

(763) 425-1001 Office 

(612) 759-5556 Cell 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George
Church
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 1:28 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Flushing and Testing of UG

 

 

While many site contractors understand and comply with the flushing

requirements of NFPA #24, we routinely encounter some that simply do not

understand and/or play dumb as a roofer when we explain the requirements
to

them. Some of these guys have been in business upwards of 50 years, and
from

the look on their faces, they've never heard of flows of this magnitude;
and

they don't understand why the 150 PSI accepted by the water company
isn't

good enough, after all- it's a water line!

 

We often feel like we're the policing agency and we spend about 40 to 80

hours a year educating these guys and emailing the U Certificate pdf
around.

 

 

The GCs generally understand the need to flush properly and when I
explain

plugged sprinklers, liability, and negligence issues/impacts to them,
and

they realize they have a vested interest in seeing that it is done
properly,

they're on our side. We often, like today, end up with the flushing
being

added to our contract. Usually its not a big deal; today's is a little

unusual since we need to rent a temporary pump (2,000 @ 150) to
accomplish

it, 6 Hose Monsters, and there are 8 lead-ins for this >800,000 SF
building;

so it'll be $15~20K.

 

So my question is:

Do any of you encounter the same level of ignorance from site
contractors as

we do? Do you bother getting a U Certificate to attach to you're a

Certificate? If you're an AHJ on this Forum, do you enforce and witness

flushing and testing of the underground on a regular basis?

 

Either the site guys are playing dumb, or no other sprinkler guy or

inspector has explained the requirements to them. Since they don't have
the

equipment to perform a proper flush, its obvious to us that there must
be a

host of UG installations that have all the original stones in the UG.

 

Does this bother any of you? I don't feel warm and fuzzy about it.

 

George Church

Rowe Sprinkler

 

_______________________________________________

Sprinklerforum mailing list

http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to