I'm far too busy to respond to this nonsense.  Get back to work.

Sorry Mr. Muncy, little stevie got loose again.

T
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: "Steve Leyton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:07:03 
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: RB-64, Home Builders Assn. Letter and marriage counseling


Justin:
 
 Don't believe him - I think he got into the party supplies again.� Um
 Geo?�� You should know better than to run that smack.�
 
 For those not in the know, both George and I work with our wives.� Both
 of us married up - WAY up.�� Don't know about Mrs. Church, but Mrs.
 Leyton doesn't like to shop; offer my partner $3K to go shopping and
 she'll end up in London at the Charger game and I'll be at home gluing
 pipe.�� Mrs. Church likes to shop but is very suspicious of Mr. Church -
 methinks a better strategy is to put the wife in charge of the sprinkler
 project.� It may drive the designer nuts but every sprinkler will "just
 so".
 
 Steve Leyton
 Protection Design & Consulting
 San Diego, CA
 
 
 -----Original Message-----
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] On Behalf Of Justin
 Reid
 Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 4:30 PM
 To: [email protected]
 Subject: Re: RB-64, Home Builders Assn. Letter
 
 Yes Beverly Hills has been a temporary base of operations for us to�
 date. Stay tuned for our not so glorious Van Nuys office opening this�
 next week.
 
 Your strategy is notable nonetheless...thanks :)
 
 Justin D. Reid, P.E.
 RLH Fire Protection
 468 N. Camden Dr.
 Beverly Hills, CA 90210
 213-798-0251
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 On Nov 11, 2008, at 3:58 PM, "George Church" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 
 > Beverly Hills, eh?
 > Just celebrated 10 yrs of working side by side with my wife- and she�
 > has the
 > checkbooks (corp and pers- and maybe some I don't know about!).
 > Here's my strategy for ya:
 >
 > If it'll cost $4,000 to install sprinklers, tell her its $2k and�
 > give her
 > $3k to go shopping. While that'll only keep her away for 20 minutes in
 > Beverly Hills, she'll be happy until she discovers what you sold off�
 > of hers
 > for the other 2k :)
 >
 > And maybe she'll just acknowledge the offer and not take you up on�
 > it. Sure
 > she will.
 >
 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] On Behalf Of�
 > Justin Reid
 > Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 6:38 PM
 > To: [email protected]
 > Subject: RE: RB-64, Home Builders Assn. Letter
 >
 > Yes,� I have not informed my wife of my retrofit plans yet. I will�
 > cross
 > that bridge closer to POJ date :).
 >
 > Justin D. Reid, P.E.
 > Project Engineer
 > RLH Fire Protection
 > 468 N. Camden Dr. #290L
 > Beverly Hills, CA 90210
 > Office: (310) 601-3013
 > Cell: (213) 798-0251
 > Fax: (866) 871-2237
 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 >
 >
 >
 >
 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] On Behalf Of George
 > Church
 > Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 3:28 PM
 > To: [email protected]
 > Subject: RE: RB-64, Home Builders Assn. Letter
 >
 > Oh, believe me I understand your predicament.
 >
 > I'm not saying all spkr geeks like us HAVE to have spkrs in our homes.
 >
 > My point was to NOT have a great oratory defused by the simple�
 > question
 > I'd
 > ask if I was a home builder deadset (pun intended) on torpedoing a�
 > spkr
 > guy's testimony. It shows you walk the walk (or live in a new house).
 >
 > I'd heard a horror story about a very dedicated spkr guy in FL that
 > fought
 > and lost a battle with his new home builder to allow him to install�
 > res
 > AS
 > in his new house. Mine were in when I bought a house from a spkr guy
 > when we
 > also bought his spkr co assets. Otherwise it'd still be in rough-in
 > phase,
 > and I'd be divorced. Heck, it'd be in design, that black hole where�
 > jobs
 > go
 > until just before POJ (pipe on job) when all of the sudden the job
 > emerges,
 > and simultaneously goes to approval, coordination and fab. Maybe not�
 > in
 > that
 > sequence :) since it takes a week to get the fab done :)
 >
 > I'd guess if you were to build today, they'd let you install�
 > anything if
 > they just got a chance to build a house. Hope we can all pull together
 > behind our new president and get this all back on track soon.
 >
 > glc
 >
 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] On Behalf Of Justin
 > Reid
 > Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 5:52 PM
 > To: [email protected]
 > Subject: RE: RB-64, Home Builders Assn. Letter
 >
 > "To add credibility, its imperative that if you're going to speak for
 > residential AS in SFDs, you live in a sprinklered house."
 >
 > In response to the above statement.
 >
 > I recently purchased a home which did not have fire sprinklers
 > installed. I have not (yet) installed fire sprinklers in my home;�
 > but, I
 > support the passing of residential fire sprinklers in the IRC.
 >
 > The IRC will only require sprinkler installation in NEW single family
 > dwellings (SFDs). It is much more cost effective to install fire
 > sprinklers in new construction when all of the walls are open and all
 > areas of the home are easily accessible. The monetary cost difference
 > for retrofitting a house with sprinklers is sometimes more than double
 > the cost to install them when the house is being constructed.
 >
 > Take my case for example. The long-term plan for my house is to�
 > install
 > fire sprinklers. However, when I do, it is going to be a royal pain in
 > the B. There are areas where I am going to have to pull out drywall�
 > and
 > (because I have a two-story house) tear up the floor in some areas as
 > well. After all the floor repairs, drywall dust cleanup and painting�
 > is
 > done, I will have fire sprinklers in my house. I could see how this
 > would deter your everyday household from retrofitting fire sprinklers
 > into their home.
 >
 > It is for this reason that the new code requirement IS so important.�
 > If
 > the fire sprinklers had been installed when my house was being
 > constructed, then their much lower cost would have been lumped into my
 > 30 year loan. Now, the installation will cost more and would be on a
 > separate loan.
 >
 > Based on this, I think I am still credible for wanting this�
 > requirement
 > to pass even though I do not have them in my existing home.� My�
 > support
 > of the new requirement is so that future homeowners will not have to
 > wrestle with the retrofit decision versus having them installed with�
 > the
 > original construction.
 >
 > Respectfully submitted,
 >
 > Justin D. Reid, P.E.
 > Project Engineer
 > RLH Fire Protection
 > 468 N. Camden Dr. #290L
 > Beverly Hills, CA 90210
 > Office: (310) 601-3013
 > Cell: (213) 798-0251
 > Fax: (866) 871-2237
 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 >
 >
 >
 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] On Behalf Of George
 > Church
 > Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 9:50 AM
 > To: [email protected]
 > Subject: RE: RB-64, Home Builders Assn. Letter
 >
 > I know Mark Richter from the Penn BOC, plus he's 3rd party AHJ on a�
 > good
 > bit
 > of our work. My understanding was that the PennBOC group was going to
 > turn
 > down any outside funding to avoid conflict of interest; there was
 > sufficient
 > doubt that the rules covering conflict of interest forbade it, they
 > erred on
 > the side of caution- or at least in the email discussion prior to the
 > trip.
 >
 >> From our perspective as knowledgeable sprinkler guys, its tough to
 > watch
 > people continue to die in SFDs when we have the ability to stop it.
 > However,
 > its tough for others to believe us when we say its because we�
 > believe in
 > protecting life and property from fire with sprinklers that we support
 > residential sprinklers- why would they believe us? Does this mean the
 > home
 > builders believe in people dying in their homes? Don't burnt down�
 > homes
 > also
 > create additional work for the builders, so a like doubt should fall�
 > on
 > them
 > as well.
 >
 > To add credibility, its imperative that if you're going to speak for
 > residential AS in SFDs, you live in a sprinklered house. Imagine�
 > giving
 > the
 > most impassioned and persuasive speech, swaying those you need, and�
 > then
 > having the opposing home builder ask if you sprinklered your own�
 > house?
 > You'd lose all credibility if you had to say "No. Heck, costs too much
 > and
 > might flood the place."
 >
 > glc
 >
 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] On Behalf Of Terri
 > Leyton
 > Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 11:51 AM
 > To: [email protected]
 > Subject: RB-64, Home Builders Assn. Letter
 >
 > I've been trying to send a post with attachments and it would appear�
 > to
 > be too big for our servers.� So, let's try this.
 >
 > Below is a letter from the Home Builders Assn. in Harrisburg.� Note�
 > the
 > big difference.� They offer travel assistance if you share the view�
 > that
 > "fire sprinklers should not be mandatory".� To my knowledge, the IRC
 > Residential Sprinkler Coalition was very careful not to qualify folks
 > who received travel assistance.� Never was anyone asked if they were
 > voting yes or no on any proposed code change.
 >
 >
 >
 > If you want a clean copy of the documents, send me an email off forum.
 >
 >
 >
 > T
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 > Terri Simmons Leyton
 >
 > PROTECTION DESIGN & CONSULTING
 >
 > 8849-B Complex Drive
 >
 > San Diego, CA 92123
 >
 > -------------------------------------------------------------
 >
 > Ph:����� 858-751-2930 - ext. 101
 >
 > Fax:��� 858-751-2933
 >
 > Cell:� 619-871-8450
 >
 > "Once every man, woman and child realizes and accepts in daily life�
 > the
 > responsibility for simple fire prevention measures, death, injury and
 > destruction by fire will be substantially reduced." Percy Bugbee,�
 > NFPA,
 > 1947
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >_______________________________________________
 > Sprinklerforum mailing list
 > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum 
 > <http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum> 
 > For Technical Assistance, send an email to:
 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 >
 > To Unsubscribe, send an email
 > to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
 >_______________________________________________
 > Sprinklerforum mailing list
 > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum 
 > <http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum> 
 > For Technical Assistance, send an email to:
 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 >
 > To Unsubscribe, send an email
 > to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
 >
 >_______________________________________________
 > Sprinklerforum mailing list
 > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum 
 > <http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum> 
 > For Technical Assistance, send an email to:
 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 >
 > To Unsubscribe, send an email
 > to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
 >_______________________________________________
 > Sprinklerforum mailing list
 > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum 
 > <http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum> 
 > For Technical Assistance, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 >
 > To Unsubscribe, send an email
 to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
 >
 >_______________________________________________
 > Sprinklerforum mailing list
 > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum 
 > <http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum> 
 > For Technical Assistance, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 >
 > To Unsubscribe, send an email
 to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
 _______________________________________________
 Sprinklerforum mailing list
 http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum 
<http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum> 
 For Technical Assistance, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 To Unsubscribe, send an email
 to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
 _______________________________________________
 Sprinklerforum mailing list
 http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum 
<http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum> 
 For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
 
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to