Scot,

I need more information about b.  the bracing request.

However, on a. IF they are changing one sprinkler for one sprinkler, with the 
same density, k-factor, coverage and so on then I don't think all of that 
detail is necessary.  However, I completely agree and would say they need to 
show enough of the existing sprinkler system to verify that the changes are 
appropriate IF there is a reason to believe the original system wasn't correct 
or appropriate, or IF walls are being removed and it was a room design design 
before then they need to show piping, valve assembly, underground and so on and 
provide calculations.  IF they are changing the area of coverage, it isn't 
one-for-one replacement, they are changing k-factors, and so on then they need 
to show piping, valve assembly, underground and so and provide calculations.

There are several different scenarios that would have to be addressed 
individually.

Scott   

(763) 425-1001 Office 
(612) 759-5556 Cell 


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of å... ....
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 12:45 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: review of sprinkler plans ends up with GC requesting the reviewer to 
provide additional plan sheet because contractor don´t want to

i am seeking a level of reasonableness.and will take all the sarcasm and
ridicule
you can throw, in order to know where that level is.

scot deal
excelsior fire
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to