If I confused you, we're even now.

glc

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chris Cahill
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 5:40 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: FM rounding and other changes

Except 13 is the predominant legal standard in the US.  FM can do whatever
they want but no where that I know of are they the legal standard.  

Perhaps you said that in your 3rd paragraph but where would FM exceed 13 but
only need 2" lines vs. 2.5"?  Do you mean to say FM has a higher density
than 13 but rounding mathematically you get 2" lines and when you recalc per
13's lower density and rounding up you end up with 2" lines?  Does this
actually happen?  Is this just a marketing trick by FM seeming to require a
higher level of protection but in reality it's the same?  Cynical I guess. 

Chris Cahill, P.E.
Fire Protection Engineer
Sentry Fire Protection, Inc.
 
763-658-4483
763-658-4921 fax
 
Email: [email protected]
 
Mail: P.O. Box 69
        Waverly, MN 55390
 
Location: 4439 Hwy 12 SW
              Waverly, MN 55390


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to