stay with your initial assumption.  A branch line supplies multiple  
sprinklers as per the definition.  The single sprinkler arm-over,  
return bends, etc are not branch lines.  Go literal.

Roland

On Jul 23, 2009, at 6:51 AM, Bobby Gillett wrote:

> Agree,
>
> As a general guideline what is the branch line requirement per  
> 9.3.6.3? In
> my previous example (by definition) this is a branch line, but I  
> don't feel
> it truly needs a restraint.
> So what do we use as a general rule? I always went with my opinion  
> that a
> branch line supplies more than one sprinkler, so in my example you  
> wouldn't
> need a restraint but if you had a single sprinkler fed from a pipe  
> 6'-0 long
> or longer coming from a main, common sense would say put one on that  
> due to
> length. That's where I feel they need to put some kind of  
> clarification as
> to pipes feeding single sprinklers - my opinions and common sense do  
> not
> always match others, even fire marshals. But going back and adding or
> putting on unnecessary restraints can be costly.
>
> Bobby Gillett
> Sr. Project Manager
> Key Fire Protection, Inc.
> (731) 424-0130 office  (731) 424-9285 fax
> (731) 267-4853 cell
> [email protected]
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 8:17 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Branchline/Restraint of Branchline
>
> Depends on just how technical you want to get.
>
> Based on the definition, the branch line serves multiple  
> sprinklers.  The
> 9.3.6.3 sounds like it's written more for a branch line where you've  
> got
> uprights or pendant sprinklers connected directly to the branch line.
> (exposed construction?)  This is supported when looking at the various
> illustrations within 13.
>
> So are we talking about a sprinkler drop or an actual branch line?
>
> The branch line support is defined in 9.2.3.4.1 (NFPA 13, 2007),  
> armover is
> covered in 9.2.3.5 and sprigs in 9.2.3.7.  If you look at sprigs for
> instance the restraint requirement applies if it's over 4 ft in  
> length.
> This same criteria could be conversely applied to a drop to a  
> sprinkler
> below.
>
> It's all up to the AHJ when it starts getting into these gray areas.
>
>
>
>
> Craig L. Prahl, CET
> Fire Protection Specialist
> Mechanical Department
> CH2MHILL
> Lockwood Greene
> 1500 International Drive
> PO Box 491, Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
> Direct - 864.599.4102
> Fax - 864.599.8439
> [email protected]
> http://www.ch2m.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bobby  
> Gillett
> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 8:46 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Branchline/Restraint of Branchline
>
> A fitter asked us how long a branch line has to be before it  
> requires end of
> the line restraint. A fire marshal told him he could never find an  
> answer so
> they put in place 13ft or longer.
>
> 9.3.6.3 The end sprinkler on a line shall be restrained against  
> excessive
> vertical and lateral movement. In my opinion, the way this is  
> written, all
> branch lines are to have them, which brought up the next debate;
>
>
>
> 3.5.1 Branch Line - The pipes supplying sprinklers, either directly or
> through sprigs, drops, return bends, or arm-overs. Would a 1x1'-0 pipe
> coming from a main supplying a single sprinkler through a return  
> bend (or
> any configuration) be a branch line, and if so would it require an  
> end of
> the line restraint? The definition says a pipe supplying sprinklers  
> so this
> would qualify because an arm-over is defined as coming from a branch  
> line.
> If this is the case, I think a limit of length is required to be put  
> on
> branch lines requiring end of the line restraint.
>
>
>
> Thank You,
>
>
>
> Bobby Gillett
>
> Sr. Project Manager
>
> Key Fire Protection, Inc.
>
> (731) 424-0130 office  (731) 424-9285 fax
>
> (731) 267-4853 cell
>
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> [email protected]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to