Craig

As you said,  I have lost my way,
actually the AHJ comments were little confusing for me..
First of all they asked to
provide sprinklers(in rack type) at the ceiling level of the mezzanine for
the below racks. and next for some query they commented back saying inrack
sprinklers cant b avoided.
I think I misread that for inrack sprinklers only.(even though he mentioned
clearly - positioned at ceiling).
Since there was no racks at the beginning they have designed the already
existing ceiling sprinklers @ 0.2 gpm/ft2 only.

I have 3 issues now.

1. In case if we are providing  ceiling sprinklers below mezz level and also
rack sprinklers ,Does that mean that no change in the already existing
ceiling sprinklers be required?

2.."""One you need to provide sprinklers below the mezzanine since the floor
space is now shielded from the ceiling sprinklers."""" IS this applicable if
the mezz is of grating type steel constrctn(means floor space is not fully
sheilded from ceiling sprinklers)?
In other wrds, can we avoid ceiling sprinkelrs below mezz level and go with
only inrack sprinklers?

 3.which commodity class can electronic goods(for scada panels)packed in
cartons  be considered?


Sam




On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 5:03 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> >From what you've written it sounds as if you are going a different
> direction than what the AHJ is requesting.  From your e-mail it appears that
> he is only requesting sprinklers below the mezzanine, not in-racks.
>
> Now what he is asking for to be installed below the mezzanine is the
> "Intermediate Style" sprinkler such as the Reliable "F-1" or Viking
> VK550/560 or similar with the integral steel shield.
>
> Some of the things you are going to need before going much further are the
> temperature of the existing ceiling sprinklers and the design criteria of
> the existing ceiling sprinklers.
>
> Looking at Table 16.2.1.3.2 and Figure 16.2.1.3.2(b), even with in-racks
> the ceiling system criteria would need to supply somewhere between .24 and
> .26/2000.  I'd be suspicious of a 5.6K design system being designed to that
> criteria.  Applying Fig. 16.2.1.3.4.1, per Table 16.2.1.3.2 at 60% of that
> (somewhere around .15) the ceiling system may work.
>
> So what I'm saying is you need more info.
>
> You have two issues.  One you need to provide sprinklers below the
> mezzanine since the floor space is now shielded from the ceiling sprinklers.
>  That's a given.  Second you need to examine the need for in-rack
> sprinklers.  Depending on the performance of the ceiling system, how you
> classify the commodity  and what your design criteria will be below the
> mezzanine, you may or may not need in-racks.
>
>
>
> As you would imagine, I've only spent a few minutes taking a look at this
> so there may be other potential approaches that would work.  But as time is
> limited I leave that for you to explore.
>
>
>
> Craig L. Prahl, CET
> Fire Protection Specialist
> Mechanical Department
> CH2MHILL
> Lockwood Greene
> 1500 International Drive
> PO Box 491, Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
> Direct - 864.599.4102
> Fax - 864.599.8439
> [email protected]
> http://www.ch2m.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of sam b
> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 7:38 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: In rack sprinklers at celing level
>
> Hiii
>
>
> I visited a warehouse (8.6 m height) which is protected by  upright
> sprinklers (K-5.6) .
>
> Now the client have added  a steel mezzanine structure with racks above and
> below.
>
> Now local Fire authority have asked to *provide sprinklers(in rack type) at
> the ceiling level of the mezzanine for the below racks.*
>
> **
>
> Racks below will be stored with electronic good items in cartons (mainly
> items for electronic panels).
>
> Max storage height will be 4 m.
>
> Their are 5 multiple row racks (2.4m wide and 9.3 m length) and 2 single
> row racks of 1.2 m wide and 9.3 m length). aisle width of 1.2 m between
> racks.
>
>
>
> >From NFPA ,I could see only one layer rack sprinklers enough for each
> >rack
> and since only 9.3 m length I need only 3 in rack sprinklers per rack.
>
> when the sprinklers provided at ceiling Is this the correct way forward??
>
> Can we provide In rack sprinklers at ceiling in these cases?
>
>
>
> I am not finding it easy to locate the answer.
>
>
>
> Any help welcome
>
>
> Thaanx in advance
>
> Sam
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email 
> to:[email protected]<to%[email protected]>
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email 
> to:[email protected]<to%[email protected]>
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to