Did you notice this as part of an ITM contract? I would do separate a "while we were at this location" letter to the owner. There is some level of moral (and legal) responsibility to report something that could be a dangerous condition. Is the "interference" because the AHJ might have missed something?
At 12:58 PM 10/29/2009, you wrote: >Anyone come across fit-ups where short drops have been removed and replaced >with 4' or 6' flexible piping to new head locations? Original calcs account >for 2' drop with two elbows, and 2 feet additional standard pipe and has a >4psi reserve above available. As-Builts give new head locations showing >proper coverage, no new calcs provided. Simple daywork job, 130 plus or >minus relo's and flex drops sure make it easy! >I do not see where this condition would be covered in an Inspection for >inclusion on a Report. And some AHJs are not appreciative of >"interference". >Suggestions? > >Garth > > >_______________________________________________ >Sprinklerforum mailing list >[email protected] >http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum > >For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected] > >To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected] >(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) Todd G. Williams, PE Fire Protection Design/Consulting Stonington, Connecticut www.fpdc.com 860.535.2080 _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected] To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
