Not to be the contrarian here, this being my first post to this forum, but,
I believe the AHJ has a point.  

 

Given your beam spacing of over 7'-6" on center, you are dealing with
unobstructed construction here.  NFPA 13 8.6.4.1.2, regarding placing the
deflector above the bottom of the structural member, relates to obstructed
construction.  In obstructed construction, we are able to place deflectors
up to 22" below roof decks since the obstructions help collect heat to
assure prompt activation of the sprinkler head.  (If you remember your older
versions of NFPA 13, we used to have to deal with the "panelized roof
limitations of 300 square feet to get the added deflector distance.)  NFPA
13 doesn't specifically address the issue of placing the deflector above the
beam in unobstructed construction and although you are meeting the
obstruction requirements of 8.6.5.1.2, the issue here is response time.
8.1.1 (2) states "Sprinklers shall be positioned and located so as to
provide satisfactory performance with respect to activation time and
distribution."  A8.1 also says "The installation requirements are specific
for the normal arrangement of structural members.  There will be
arrangements of structural members not specifically detailed by the
requirements."  Just because your head is not obstructed and you have met
the deflector distance requirements for unobstructed construction doesn't
mean it will work as intended.  

 

The theory behind automatic sprinkler performance requires that the head be
in the jet stream or in a pocket that will collect heat in a timely manner.
With limited obstructions to collect heat, that distance will be 5 to 12% of
the height of the ceiling above the fire source.   This is the theory behind
the 12" deflector distance rule for unobstructed construction.  Given the
language of NFPA A8.1 and 8.1.1 the AHJ is not off base in being concerned
with response times.  Unless you have a 30'+ ceiling, I would have concerns
that the jet stream would be cut off by the beams and that the heat would
not collect fast enough to assure prompt activation of the head and/or
skipping would occur causing head outside of the fire area to activate prior
to heads in and around the fire area due to the jet stream being directed
away from those heads by the beams.  

 

Michael Ricks

Katco Fire Sprinkler Design

P.O. Box 607

555 South 100 East

Salem, UT   84653

801-423-3096  Cell:  801-380-4651

[email protected]

 

 

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to